← Back to Contribution

Process for proposing new components and patterns to the design system

PROCESSProposal Workflow

Structured process for proposing new design system components

1
Discovery & Research

Validate the need and explore existing solutions

  • • Identify user need and use cases
  • • Research existing patterns in other systems
  • • Check for similar components already in system
  • • Analyze usage frequency and adoption potential
2
RFC (Request for Comments)

Submit formal proposal for community review

  • • Create RFC document with detailed specification
  • • Include visual mockups and interaction patterns
  • • Define API and accessibility requirements
  • • Open GitHub Discussion for community feedback
3
Design Review

Collaborative design refinement process

  • • Present to Design System Working Group
  • • Iterate based on design critique feedback
  • • Validate accessibility compliance
  • • Approve final design specifications
4
Implementation

Development and testing phase

  • • Build component with comprehensive tests
  • • Create component documentation
  • • Implement accessibility features
  • • Code review and quality assurance
5
Release & Adoption

Launch and monitor component usage

  • • Beta release for early adopters
  • • Gather feedback and iterate
  • • Official release with migration guide
  • • Monitor adoption and collect metrics
RFCRFC Template Structure

Required sections for component proposal RFC

# RFC: [Component Name]

## Summary
Brief description of the proposed component and its purpose.

## Motivation
- What user need does this address?
- Why is this component necessary?
- What problems does it solve?

## Detailed Design

### Visual Design
- Mockups and visual specifications
- Interaction states (default, hover, active, disabled)
- Responsive behavior
- Dark mode considerations

### API Design
```tsx
interface ComponentProps {
  // Define the component API
  variant?: 'primary' | 'secondary'
  size?: 'sm' | 'md' | 'lg'
  disabled?: boolean
  children: React.ReactNode
  onClick?: () => void
}
```

### Accessibility
- Keyboard navigation support
- Screen reader compatibility
- WCAG compliance level
- Focus management

### Usage Examples
```tsx
// Basic usage
<NewComponent>Content</NewComponent>

// With props
<NewComponent variant="primary" size="lg">
  Action Button
</NewComponent>
```

## Implementation Plan
- Development timeline
- Testing strategy
- Documentation requirements
- Migration considerations

## Alternatives Considered
- Other design approaches evaluated
- Why this solution is preferred

## Open Questions
- Unresolved design decisions
- Areas needing community input
CRITERIAEvaluation Criteria

How component proposals are evaluated for inclusion

🎨 Design Quality

Consistency

Aligns with existing design language

Accessibility

Meets WCAG 2.1 AA standards

Usability

Intuitive and user-friendly

Flexibility

Adaptable to various contexts

📊 Business Value

Adoption Potential

Expected usage across products

Maintenance Cost

Long-term support requirements

Implementation Effort

Development complexity and timeline

Strategic Alignment

Supports product roadmap goals

MATRIXDecision Matrix Example

Scoring framework for component proposal evaluation

CriteriaWeightScore (1-5)Weighted Score
User Need & Demand25%41.0
Design Quality20%51.0
Accessibility Compliance20%40.8
Implementation Complexity15%30.45
Maintenance Burden10%40.4
Strategic Value10%50.5
Total Score100%-4.15/5
✅ Approved: Score ≥ 3.5 | 🔄 Needs Work: Score 2.5-3.4 | ❌ Rejected:Score < 2.5
SUCCESSRecent Success Stories

Examples of successfully proposed and implemented components

🎯 Progress Indicator

Multi-step form navigation

📅 Proposed: Jan 2024
🚀 Released: Mar 2024
📊 Adoption: 12 products

🔔 Notification Badge

Status indicators for UI elements

📅 Proposed: Feb 2024
🚀 Released: Apr 2024
📊 Adoption: 8 products

📊 Data Table

Complex data display component

📅 Proposed: Dec 2023
🚀 Released: Feb 2024
📊 Adoption: 15 products
TIPSProposal Best Practices

Tips for creating successful component proposals

✅ DO

  • • Start with user research and real use cases
  • • Provide comprehensive visual mockups
  • • Consider all interaction states
  • • Include accessibility requirements
  • • Engage the community early
  • • Be open to feedback and iteration
  • • Document implementation details
  • • Plan for long-term maintenance

❌ AVOID

  • • Proposing without validation
  • • Ignoring existing similar components
  • • Skipping accessibility considerations
  • • Creating overly complex solutions
  • • Not considering maintenance costs
  • • Dismissing community feedback
  • • Rushing through the review process
  • • Forgetting cross-platform needs